Précis

Epiphanies: Analytical Précis

Sophie Grace Chappell 

The Open University, UK

Chappell, Sophie Grace. 2026. “Epiphanies: Analytical Précis.” 

Journal of Philosophy of Emotion 7, no. 2: 1-4. https://doi.org/10.33497/2026.winter.1.

Abstract: My book Epiphanies: An Ethics of Experience (2022) proposes an approach to ethics that begins not in attempts to systematise moral philosophy, but in our own experience of life as ethical subjects, ethical agents, and ethical patients. This précis gives an overview of Epiphanies, which is the subject of a book symposium in the Journal of Philosophy of Emotion. The overview covers the book's eight chapters and conclusion. 

Keywords: Ethics, moral philosophy, epiphanies, phenomenology, experience

In chapter 1, “Introducing epiphanies," I introduce and define the central idea of the book, that of an epiphany—a “wow moment” or “aha moment," a “peak experience." I begin with three examples of epiphany, from Bede Griffiths, Gerard Manley Hopkins, and Iris Murdoch. I go on to discuss numerous other examples; and I consider different developments of the idea or something like it in history, and in William Wordsworth, C. S. Lewis, James Joyce, and others.

In chapter 2, “If not moral theory then what?” I defend my rejection of the theory-building approach to ethical philosophy, and having said what my own approach is not, and offered a critique of systematic moral theory, I begin to develop a positive characterisation of what it is. This draws on Bernard Williams’ approach in some ways; but an anti-theorist does not need to base her position on Williams’ internal reasons thesis, which I reject.

In chapter 3, “Encounters with values," I further develop my positive proposal that it is in epiphanies in particular that we encounter value by offering what I call the recognitionalist manifesto, and give a clearer idea of the import of this proposal by bringing into contact with a number of positions in contemporary moral philosophy.

[page 1]

In chapter 4, “What is it like to be a human being?" I offer a descriptive exploration of human phenomenology. It is in epiphanies in particular that we encounter value; but it isn’t only there. Value is pervasively presented to us in the whole continuum of our subjective experience, not only the peaks in that continuum that we call epiphanies. So it is important to look at the whole continuum. Our subjective experience is very complex and very various, so I cannot examine all of it. But in this chapter, without falling into the rudimentary yet very common mistake of aiming for a comprehensive list, I look at some important aspects. 

In chapter 5, “Soul Food: experience, art, and psychic nutrition," I take another approach to our questions about epiphanies and experience. I ask: What nourishes the human psyche? Or as we might put it: what is soul food? The answer leads me to consider art, ethics, and religion, and the notions of symbol, narrative, and icon as they occur in those contexts. These notions are three of the key concepts around which our experience, including our epiphanic experience, is structured.

In chapter 6, “Epiphanies and other people," I begin with epiphanies of other people, then consider some more general questions to do with scepticism about epiphanies of other people, and indeed about epiphanies as such. These questions lead me into metaethics, and into questions in the philosophy of mind. They lead me to consider two kinds of scepticism about epiphanies, relativism and nihilism. I explain my (broadly neo-Wittgensteinian-realist) reasons for rejecting both, and take a view about the admissible contents of experience that I call “phenomenal socialism." (There will be more about relativism in Chapter 8.)

In chapter 7, “Ethical experience and other people," I ask how any individual’s subjective experience involves other people. I have already argued in 6.8 that we should be phenomenal socialists, i.e. that we should accept the thesis that what we actually, directly, literally perceive is primarily the high-level phenomenal. Chapter 7 argues, among other things, that we should be developmental-psychological socialists too: i.e., that we should accept the thesis that, as a matter of developmental psychology, the social does not just precede the individual, it creates it. I discuss five particular ways in which the social is constitutively involved in individuality: in child-development, in scripts, in audiences, in empathy, and in the publicity of the mental.

In the book’s last chapter, chapter 8, “Religion, Relativism, and the New Republic," I respond—more exploratorily than conclusively—to the threat of relativism to my epiphany-based and experience-based ethics. Central to my response is a sort of transcendental argument: views that can be acceptable to us must be ones that are contributory to, not subversive of, a republic of conversation. 

The conclusion to the book suggests ways of moving beyond the wordiness of any book, including a 220,000-word one like Epiphanies, into the stillness and silence that makes us ready to receive epiphanies.

[page 2]

Notes

[1] The Conclusion contains the only clear misprint that I have noticed in the printed copy of Epiphanies: the opening words of the fourth paragraph on page 426 should be, “We should deploy."

[page 3]

References

1. Chappell, Sophie Grace. 2022. Epiphanies: An Ethics of Experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 

[page 4]

Sophie Grace Chappell © 2026

Author email: Sophie[dash]Grace[dot]Chappell[at]open[dot]ac[dot]uk